The first sentence of Wikipedia’s English-language page for Lee Harvey Oswald says: “Lee Harvey Oswald (October 18, 1939 – November 24, 1963) was a U.S. Marine veteran who assassinated John F. Kennedy, the 35th President of the United States, on November 22, 1963.”
I did a random survey of Wiki’s pages on Oswald in other languages, used Google Translate, and couldn’t find ONE that said this. All referred to Oswald as the government’s “chief suspect” or the man “accused by the Warren Commission” or something else with a qualifier. Since Wiki’s biggest English-reading audience by far is the US, this suggests something about the way the narrative on the assassination is controlled internationally.
Once I attempted to “edit” the English-language Oswald page to reflect a more objective description of the accused assassin. The rebuff from the faceless “moderator” was resolute and ruthless. I was told I had “no right” to edit the page, even though I’ve edited many Wiki pages without any contest or controversy.
ChatGPT reflects the studied belligerence of the authorities (government officials, Media, educators) where the only “conspiracy” considered (and even stressed - there are repeated references to “lone gunman”, “acted alone”, “larger conspiracy”) is whether Oswald had associates, and where any consideration, discussion, or even acknowledgment of conspiracy to frame or set up Oswald to take the fall and the blame for the crime as the patsy is strictly forbidden.
The first sentence of Wikipedia’s English-language page for Lee Harvey Oswald says: “Lee Harvey Oswald (October 18, 1939 – November 24, 1963) was a U.S. Marine veteran who assassinated John F. Kennedy, the 35th President of the United States, on November 22, 1963.”
I did a random survey of Wiki’s pages on Oswald in other languages, used Google Translate, and couldn’t find ONE that said this. All referred to Oswald as the government’s “chief suspect” or the man “accused by the Warren Commission” or something else with a qualifier. Since Wiki’s biggest English-reading audience by far is the US, this suggests something about the way the narrative on the assassination is controlled internationally.
Once I attempted to “edit” the English-language Oswald page to reflect a more objective description of the accused assassin. The rebuff from the faceless “moderator” was resolute and ruthless. I was told I had “no right” to edit the page, even though I’ve edited many Wiki pages without any contest or controversy.
ChatGPT reflects the studied belligerence of the authorities (government officials, Media, educators) where the only “conspiracy” considered (and even stressed - there are repeated references to “lone gunman”, “acted alone”, “larger conspiracy”) is whether Oswald had associates, and where any consideration, discussion, or even acknowledgment of conspiracy to frame or set up Oswald to take the fall and the blame for the crime as the patsy is strictly forbidden.
How many mainstream journalists actually collect a monthly check from the CIA or one of its cutouts? We might be shocked by the answer.
The ChatGPT replies are now different and back the Lone Nut argument.