Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Douglas Horne's avatar

David Mamet made an important statement in his discussion with Bill Maher: namely, that the Zapruder film is an altered film, and that the "head explosion" in frame 313 is fake, i.e., painted on in that frame (and that other frames associated with the "headshot" are missing from the film). Unfortunately, Mamet made three mistakes about the Z film when talking about his unproduced screenplay about the Z film's alteration: mistake #1 was when he said the original film was not developed in Dallas; actually, it was, and the ARRB commissioned a report that proved this as an undeniable fact; mistake #2 was when he said that the film was altered in Los Angeles. The film was actually altered at Kodak's R&D laboratory called "Hawkeyeworks" in Rochester, N.Y. at Kodak Headquarters, on November 24, 1963. You can read all about this in chapter 14 of my book, "Inside the ARRB." Mistake #3 was when Mamet claimed that the Zapruder film was shot at a speed of 24 frames per second; in actuality, Zapruder's Bell and Howell camera was designed to operate at 16 fps, and ran a bit fast, according to the FBI, at an average of 18.3 fps. [The 24 fps cited by Mamet is the operating speed for commercial motion pictures, not home movie cameras like Zapruder's.] I would love to see Mamet make such a film, but the actual tale of the film's interrupted chain-of-custody and alteration the weekend of the assassination is already dramatic enough; it doesn't need to be fictionalized in a way that introduces errors into the story. The real story is dramatic enough. Viewers should watch two YouTube programs to learn about this: "L'image 313," and "The Zapruder Film Mystery." They both recount what happened to the film the weekend of the assassination, based on my 2011 video interview of the CIA's Dino Brugioni, and interviews of other CIA personnel by the ARRB staff. Mamet should become more familiar with the FACTS surrounding the film's alteration---I don't think he is familiar with the actual facts, as revealed by his misstatements. David Mamet should rewrite his screenplay based on the factual account of what happened to the Zapruder film the weekend of the assassination, instead of creating a completely fictional story centered on Hollywood. I believe it was hubris on Mamet's part to make Hollywood the center of the alteration story; he should become acquainted with the true facts of the alteration, and make a film about those dramatic events. END

Expand full comment
edward connor's avatar

Anyone interested in alleged alteration of the Z film should read Doug Horne's recent comments on this site. There is unquestionably a crude black patch which was applied to the right lower occiput in Z-317. JFK's in-house film analyst (Bruno _____?) who studied the U-2 photos of the Cuban missile sites in 1962, saw the film within 24 hours and said the publicly distributed version is NOT what he saw.

In addition, look at the photos of JFK's shirt, preferably in color. The left side is pristine; the right side is completely smeared with blood and detritis. Listen to the DPD motorcycle outriders, one of whom was splattered with debris as he rode left outboard of the president. Finally, look at the Nix film after its frame matching Z-313. You can see debris flowing rearward on the trunk of the Lincoln.

Expand full comment
155 more comments...

No posts