Yes, These online meetings are terrific. I too, am unavailable when they are Live. It would be great to have them all posted on a separate "ZOOM Tab" on the JFKFACTS Substack. I think this would greatly increase views, for the Meetings.
Christopher's insights are a great asset! Being very deaf from too many rock concerts and Covid, I greatly appreciate that Jeff provided a transcript of Christopher's comments.
I tried to join the meeting and received a Zoom error message telling me that the meeting was full. It's incredible to see the interest Trump's order has generated.
I’ve been a serious student of the JFK assassination since high school. I was 13 on the day he was murdered and after reading Mark Lane's "Rush to Judgment" as a junior in high school I became somewhat obsessed with finding the truth. I’ve been at it ever since and I’ve never considered this crime to be the purview of Democrats or Republicans, liberals or conservatives. I came of age at the height of the Vietnam War but was lucky enough, unlike many of my friends and peers, to have been bypassed by the draft and graduated from college in 1971 with a history degree which resulted in a very successful teaching career from which I retired in 2005. I included a 2 week "JFK Assassination" study every year I was teaching and it became the most meaningful and memorable thing to my students, many of whom still stay in touch and remind me of it. In the 1970s I was a devoted JFK/RFK Democrat and voted that way until Carter's disastrous presidency and then I turned to Reagan and never looked back. I’m not a registered Republican and I describe myself as a constitutional conservative. The Democrat party of JFK is no more and has not been for more than three decades, IMHO. The coup d' etat, orchestrated by the CIA, that was the JFK plot, is an issue of the constitutional order and the political, economic and social structure of our country. The Deep State has virtually seized control of foreign and domestic policy since the inception of the Cold War, regardless of which political party holds the reins of power. Regardless of one’s position on Trump, he is the only president to challenge the Deep State since JFK and that challenge has put him in their crosshairs since 2015, and after using every weapon in their arsenal, especially including the Butler, PA attempt of 7/13/24 (we’ve been told nothing about Thomas Matthew Crooks) Trump made good on his promise to open all the JFK documents. The behavior of the Democrats during the recent JFK Task Force hearings was despicable while the Republicans seemed genuinely interested in seeking answers to their questions though most seemed to know very little of the details in any significant way. Understandable since the event is almost 62 years ago and most weren’t even born when it happened. The murder of JFK, the first president to challenge the power of the MIC and the Deep State, is the most sinister state crime in American history, the repercussions of which still haunt and effect us to this day. This is not about political ideology or party, it’s about the Constitution and the enormous lie that was successfully foisted on the country, the world and history for the ensuing six decades. I’m cautiously optimistic but also skeptical and cynical about what we will discover after all this time. We’ve been lied to so incessantly and for so long that the truth by now may be undiscoverable.
Gabbard never had a "relationship" with Assad. She committed the crime of talking to an adversary. We should be talking to all our adversaries unless we want endless war.
Not everything that comes out of an adversary's mouth is untrue. Is admitting what is true "repeating a talking point?". Is a "talking point" anything other than something that contradicts our government's narrative?
If there's a problem with Gabbard, it's consistency.
Are all of the Thursday night chats eventually posted on the web site?
Seems to be some gaps.
My schedule doesn't allow me to be available when they take place.
The ones I have heard are terrific and I'd very much like to get caught on at least some of what I've missed.
Thanks.
I agree I am in Scotland and cannot listen live and some of the Thursday calls are not being uploaded it seems, they are very valuable.
MDG
I find them 5 or 6 days after the broadcast. They are eventually posted.
Yes, These online meetings are terrific. I too, am unavailable when they are Live. It would be great to have them all posted on a separate "ZOOM Tab" on the JFKFACTS Substack. I think this would greatly increase views, for the Meetings.
But not all. Only select ZOOM Meetings are posted later. I agree, it would be great to have them all posted on a separate Tab.
Really great stuff here. But remember, always believe someone when the tell you who they are. The first time.
I'm am currently watching this video, great stuff Morley & Co. !
Christopher's insights are a great asset! Being very deaf from too many rock concerts and Covid, I greatly appreciate that Jeff provided a transcript of Christopher's comments.
The term "intelligence community" is a euphemism. They are something far more sinister than people who merely collect intelligence.
George W once said about the Middle East, “I have low expectations. That way they are met”.
Trump doesn’t care a thing about signed commitments promises etc. the law the constitution etc. All of those mean nothing
As far as Tucker Carlson he has no integrity. His followers would believe it if they found the Loch Ness monster in Lake Eeri
My father used to say if wishes were horses beggars would ride
Ronald Reagan said Trust but verify
I can only be conned if I allow myself to be
I will be pleasantly surprised if something does happen
How’s it going to be any different this time
Lake Erie
Cabinet nominees can lose 3 Republican votes in the Senate, because the Vice President can break a tie.
I can tell by what is happening here on my end I have attracted someone's attention.
Not being able to access comments for Lawrence P. Schnapf Jan 25, 2025 is a sure sign.
Your discussion here is undoubtedly drawing great interest from some of your adversaries.
You are aware we are all involved in making history currently. No matter how it is cut!
I tried to join the meeting and received a Zoom error message telling me that the meeting was full. It's incredible to see the interest Trump's order has generated.
I’ve been a serious student of the JFK assassination since high school. I was 13 on the day he was murdered and after reading Mark Lane's "Rush to Judgment" as a junior in high school I became somewhat obsessed with finding the truth. I’ve been at it ever since and I’ve never considered this crime to be the purview of Democrats or Republicans, liberals or conservatives. I came of age at the height of the Vietnam War but was lucky enough, unlike many of my friends and peers, to have been bypassed by the draft and graduated from college in 1971 with a history degree which resulted in a very successful teaching career from which I retired in 2005. I included a 2 week "JFK Assassination" study every year I was teaching and it became the most meaningful and memorable thing to my students, many of whom still stay in touch and remind me of it. In the 1970s I was a devoted JFK/RFK Democrat and voted that way until Carter's disastrous presidency and then I turned to Reagan and never looked back. I’m not a registered Republican and I describe myself as a constitutional conservative. The Democrat party of JFK is no more and has not been for more than three decades, IMHO. The coup d' etat, orchestrated by the CIA, that was the JFK plot, is an issue of the constitutional order and the political, economic and social structure of our country. The Deep State has virtually seized control of foreign and domestic policy since the inception of the Cold War, regardless of which political party holds the reins of power. Regardless of one’s position on Trump, he is the only president to challenge the Deep State since JFK and that challenge has put him in their crosshairs since 2015, and after using every weapon in their arsenal, especially including the Butler, PA attempt of 7/13/24 (we’ve been told nothing about Thomas Matthew Crooks) Trump made good on his promise to open all the JFK documents. The behavior of the Democrats during the recent JFK Task Force hearings was despicable while the Republicans seemed genuinely interested in seeking answers to their questions though most seemed to know very little of the details in any significant way. Understandable since the event is almost 62 years ago and most weren’t even born when it happened. The murder of JFK, the first president to challenge the power of the MIC and the Deep State, is the most sinister state crime in American history, the repercussions of which still haunt and effect us to this day. This is not about political ideology or party, it’s about the Constitution and the enormous lie that was successfully foisted on the country, the world and history for the ensuing six decades. I’m cautiously optimistic but also skeptical and cynical about what we will discover after all this time. We’ve been lied to so incessantly and for so long that the truth by now may be undiscoverable.
I read an article recently about the DNI. I wish I had saved it
It was from a very reputable investigative reporter who has written for many years on the intelligence community
He said the DNI has no actual job description and if you asked former ones they would tell you that. He cited Clapper, I think, as an example
Probably the biggest thing they do is compile reports and take them to the president. We know Trump doesn’t read them
Gabbard has much bigger problems with her Assad relationship and regurgitating Putin talking points
Gabbard never had a "relationship" with Assad. She committed the crime of talking to an adversary. We should be talking to all our adversaries unless we want endless war.
Not everything that comes out of an adversary's mouth is untrue. Is admitting what is true "repeating a talking point?". Is a "talking point" anything other than something that contradicts our government's narrative?
If there's a problem with Gabbard, it's consistency.
Gabbard was on the intelligence committee
She talked with Assad in 2017. She went on her own. It was not a scheduled trip and it was not part of Congressional trip
I’m going to speculate she didn’t know some of things the administration was doing
This is not good as she was not officially approved to go there
She held the title on Congressional Representative. This blurs the line of whether she is official or not
This is why they passed the Logan act. While she didn’t break it the act was put in place also to discourage this type of behavior
The only reason we even had troops there was to combat ISIS, really nothing to do with israel
I’m sorry I meant Syria
Thank you Larry!
Fernand is right congress needs to validate itself, for the sake of Dog Do Something!!!
58:45 great point by Fernand Amandi -
And what was. it I said in my comments not available now about congress? :`)
You could end up taking a dirt nap too!