7 Comments

Jeff, that was an intriguing account of the backstory of your interest in the JFK Assassination — as well as an excellent explanation of your fact-based approach to uncovering the truth of what happened in Dallas, in November 1963. Thanks for all that you’ve done — & continue to do — in pursuit of this worthy goal…

Expand full comment

Jeff, this reminds me a lot of the approach I was taught as a government analyst; focus on what you know, think about your level of confidence in the evidence, and try to understand things in a micro way rather than macro way - ie, step by step, building block by building block - and accept the limits of what you don't know. Also - keep focusing on what's new, and the extent to which it sits on or off the curve of your current understanding.

Expand full comment

This was fantastic, Jeff. Thanks.

Expand full comment

Focus and discipline. Thanks for sharing your story.

Expand full comment
founding

Thanks for this. As always excellent! My question is whether (using a Bayesian approach) you view some scenarios as more likely than others - and if yes, which seem most plausible even if their probability is still less than 50%?

Expand full comment

Fascinating account of your approach to the JFK assassination, and your personal connection to this ongoing saga. Thank you!

Expand full comment

This was amazing, Jeff - thank you (as always)!

Expand full comment