Has Tulsi ever said anything about the JFK assassination documents? How great it would be if she's for full disclosure.
Trump wouldn't have nominated her for such a high position if he didn't have full faith in her opinions. I consider this appointment as his most important to date.
The smears reported as news in the MSM are despicable. Last night for example, Norah O'Donnell of CBS News reported as fact that Tulsi repeats "Russian talking points." Is it any wonder why the MSM is rapidly losing readers and viewers?
Glenn Greenwald offers a nuanced and very intelligent analysis of Trump's appointments starting with Tulsi's:
At the end of the day, I would expect Tulsi to fall in line with the standard operating procedure on disclosure and not take any strong stance. Disclosure imo would come down to whether Trump feels beholden to his representations and promises. We know he didn’t last time he was in office, but he renewed his purported plan to disclose in the lead up to Election Day. Does the fact Trump likely won’t feel as deferential to establishment types as he did in his first term (he likely realized his inexperience and was quicker to defer during his first term) change the ultimate outcome? When establishment folks come and advise him not to order full disclosure (and they will) will he actually change his response and reject their advice? It’s hard to say. Given the shenanigans during the Biden administration I’m not even sure if the issue will be raised as a matter of schedule (there are no disclosure deadlines approaching in light of the “transparency plan” trickery). Thus, disclosure might take an affirmative action by the president - in other words, the issue might not come up if Trump himself doesn’t force the issue (notwithstanding the outcome of the current litigation). And will he force the issue? I’m not sure it’s important enough to him. Time will tell.
Last time, he listened to godawful Mike Pompeo who fortunately won't be around this time, but I agree with your observations. In addition, Trump's opinions are very much influenced by whoever he talked to last. On the bright side, the issue is important to RFK Jr, and hopefully, Bobby will push Trump on the issue.
We should also be realistic about what the CIA is capable of doing to get its way: extortion, death threats to people and their family members, and of course assassination. Putting Tulsi on the terrorist watch list was just a tap on the shoulder. The CIA is capable of anything. This is the real America. Is it reasonable to think that anyone will not comply in the face of these tactics including Tulsi, Bobby, and Trump?
There's a video on YouTube in which Roger Stone expresses his fear that Trump will be assassinated before his inauguration. Again, this is the real America.
Has Tulsi ever said anything about the JFK assassination documents? How great it would be if she's for full disclosure.
Trump wouldn't have nominated her for such a high position if he didn't have full faith in her opinions. I consider this appointment as his most important to date.
The smears reported as news in the MSM are despicable. Last night for example, Norah O'Donnell of CBS News reported as fact that Tulsi repeats "Russian talking points." Is it any wonder why the MSM is rapidly losing readers and viewers?
Glenn Greenwald offers a nuanced and very intelligent analysis of Trump's appointments starting with Tulsi's:
https://youtu.be/_-hrKHs3Ukk?si=SpDBSGuUcbV6Y8j8
Uber-warmonger Bolton is doing back flips.
At the end of the day, I would expect Tulsi to fall in line with the standard operating procedure on disclosure and not take any strong stance. Disclosure imo would come down to whether Trump feels beholden to his representations and promises. We know he didn’t last time he was in office, but he renewed his purported plan to disclose in the lead up to Election Day. Does the fact Trump likely won’t feel as deferential to establishment types as he did in his first term (he likely realized his inexperience and was quicker to defer during his first term) change the ultimate outcome? When establishment folks come and advise him not to order full disclosure (and they will) will he actually change his response and reject their advice? It’s hard to say. Given the shenanigans during the Biden administration I’m not even sure if the issue will be raised as a matter of schedule (there are no disclosure deadlines approaching in light of the “transparency plan” trickery). Thus, disclosure might take an affirmative action by the president - in other words, the issue might not come up if Trump himself doesn’t force the issue (notwithstanding the outcome of the current litigation). And will he force the issue? I’m not sure it’s important enough to him. Time will tell.
Last time, he listened to godawful Mike Pompeo who fortunately won't be around this time, but I agree with your observations. In addition, Trump's opinions are very much influenced by whoever he talked to last. On the bright side, the issue is important to RFK Jr, and hopefully, Bobby will push Trump on the issue.
We should also be realistic about what the CIA is capable of doing to get its way: extortion, death threats to people and their family members, and of course assassination. Putting Tulsi on the terrorist watch list was just a tap on the shoulder. The CIA is capable of anything. This is the real America. Is it reasonable to think that anyone will not comply in the face of these tactics including Tulsi, Bobby, and Trump?
There's a video on YouTube in which Roger Stone expresses his fear that Trump will be assassinated before his inauguration. Again, this is the real America.
important enough to him*
Our sad reality. I won't be listening.
Off-topic breaking news:
Bugliosi was pressured by the CIA to write Helter Skelter. Interview with author Tom O'Neill:
https://youtu.be/aqAL1M9Rb9o?si=PUVuYvk34iCynW
Air Force witness sees Oswald look-alike board plane in Dallas on day of assassination. New video by Tom Yacucci:
https://youtu.be/PreyRL-zz0c?si=7396eWiCsIpgi3Lc
OMG.