Hi Jeff, a little bit of context on Luna and her statements; I've followed her a bit on the UAP track, and so I think I might have a bit of helpful insight on her terminology.
Sadly, I don't think she's referring to the JFK SCIF, she is more likely talking about the Congressional SCIF that she and the rest of the UAP caucus and oversight committees have been utilizing to interview UAP whistleblowers. And coupled with her mention that they will punish anyone obstructing their work within the agencies, it sounds to me like a threat — "we know (or, will know) what you have, so don't get in our way". It sounds like they're counting on whistleblowers coming to them and revealing what is there, what they should go for, which, I can't lie, that sounds like the best course of action. I do think the implied threat is that while they can't force declassification, they can ask Trump to intervene.
Regarding her mention of calling in Warren commission staffers and Parkland doctors .. I do think it's a bit of a desperate attempt to appeal to ageing insiders to come out as whistleblowers on the congressional record, but it's .. a little late in the day, wouldn't you agree? HSCA and ARRB members may make more sense in this regard. But she could be thinking of original witnesses, like Clint Hill (RIP) or Paul Landis?
Regarding the "two shooters", it's anyone's guess where she picked it up — HSCA? Parkland doctors documentary? Josiah Thompson? Initial FBI report?
However, it's important to note that, even with the powers you might expect from people on the oversight committee, the UAP caucus have had limited success wielding their SCIF access — they have repeatedly been denied access to interviewing specific whistleblowers in the SCIF, as all parties must have matching security clearances. Only a select group of members on the Armed Services, Intelligence, Defense and Homeland Security committees have such clearances, I believe. And without their own subpoena power, really the Task Force doesn't have much power.
If you think this is the person that will finally wrestle the truth from the government, you may want to watch this 2 minute video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adJXE8CckeQ Compromised is one word that comes to mind. Other words include unqualified, inexperienced, and clueless. Sylvia Meagher she is not. Meet the real Anna Paulina Luna Mayerhofer. Then get back to your research.
There are plenty of us out here in the nation who know this secrecy thing has failed.
CIA knows damned well they are under the gun here. The secret funding there is enough to end their rein the truth be known. Laundering drug money, I mean cripes.
Around 27 minutes Chad talks about this document at Mary Ferrell, Hoover involved and Jeff had me on the edge of my seat. I though sure as hell he is going to slip up and say the quiet part, out loud, that being LBJ and Hoover knew something must be done to shut Oswald up.
Hi Jeff, a little bit of context on Luna and her statements; I've followed her a bit on the UAP track, and so I think I might have a bit of helpful insight on her terminology.
Sadly, I don't think she's referring to the JFK SCIF, she is more likely talking about the Congressional SCIF that she and the rest of the UAP caucus and oversight committees have been utilizing to interview UAP whistleblowers. And coupled with her mention that they will punish anyone obstructing their work within the agencies, it sounds to me like a threat — "we know (or, will know) what you have, so don't get in our way". It sounds like they're counting on whistleblowers coming to them and revealing what is there, what they should go for, which, I can't lie, that sounds like the best course of action. I do think the implied threat is that while they can't force declassification, they can ask Trump to intervene.
Regarding her mention of calling in Warren commission staffers and Parkland doctors .. I do think it's a bit of a desperate attempt to appeal to ageing insiders to come out as whistleblowers on the congressional record, but it's .. a little late in the day, wouldn't you agree? HSCA and ARRB members may make more sense in this regard. But she could be thinking of original witnesses, like Clint Hill (RIP) or Paul Landis?
Regarding the "two shooters", it's anyone's guess where she picked it up — HSCA? Parkland doctors documentary? Josiah Thompson? Initial FBI report?
However, it's important to note that, even with the powers you might expect from people on the oversight committee, the UAP caucus have had limited success wielding their SCIF access — they have repeatedly been denied access to interviewing specific whistleblowers in the SCIF, as all parties must have matching security clearances. Only a select group of members on the Armed Services, Intelligence, Defense and Homeland Security committees have such clearances, I believe. And without their own subpoena power, really the Task Force doesn't have much power.
If anyone sees this note in the next couple minutes, Luna is being interviewed live on Cuomo, NewsNation. It's 5:18 pm. Should be interesting.
Kash Patel has said he has seen all the JFK documents. He said "there is nothing in them that is not already out there."
I want to see what is left at the Secret Service, ONI, and Military Intelligence.
If you think this is the person that will finally wrestle the truth from the government, you may want to watch this 2 minute video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adJXE8CckeQ Compromised is one word that comes to mind. Other words include unqualified, inexperienced, and clueless. Sylvia Meagher she is not. Meet the real Anna Paulina Luna Mayerhofer. Then get back to your research.
Chad is awesome in his depth of knowledge, unbelievable. Shades of Fred Hampton and Mark Clark.
Malcom died Feb 21, 1965.
There are plenty of us out here in the nation who know this secrecy thing has failed.
CIA knows damned well they are under the gun here. The secret funding there is enough to end their rein the truth be known. Laundering drug money, I mean cripes.
Around 27 minutes Chad talks about this document at Mary Ferrell, Hoover involved and Jeff had me on the edge of my seat. I though sure as hell he is going to slip up and say the quiet part, out loud, that being LBJ and Hoover knew something must be done to shut Oswald up.