'This is a big deal. The CIA is changing its tune on Lee Harvey Oswald,' Jefferson Morley said of newly released documents regarding CIA officer Joannides
Previously Jefferson Morley had reported that "Nicholas Nalli has posted a thoughtful response to my piece, 'From the New JFK Files: What the Medical Evidence Tells Us,' on Fred Litwin’s blog. Its mild tone is a balm in these disputatious times."
Balderdash!
Mr. Nalli is just a bargain basement Renatus Hartogs for our time. Via a delivery system comprised of disinformation expressed in pseudo-intellectual babble, he attempts to defend the LN lie by application of the Principle of Parsimony.
The essence of Mr. Nalli's argument: a simple lie trumps a complex truth.
A deftly planned and executed intelligence operation that includes a bodyguard of fabricated "evidence" presented via arguments from authority turns William of Occam's celebrated razor into a dullened blade with all the cutting power of a plastic dinner knife.
If Mr. Nalli does not already comprehend this most basic reality, then his analyses of any intel-related phenomena must be considered fatally flawed even as they justly come under suspicion of being wittingly delivered components of the prevarication at hand.
Understand that the foundational goal of the JFK assassination cover-up is not to convince, but to control -- to create, refine, and preserve paralyzing, justice-denying doubt that extends beyond the matter of the Dallas action into the entirety of the culture.
The likes of Mr. Nalli and his mouthpiece, the evil clown Mr. Litwin, are assigned to encourage polite debate so that the illusion of a level playing field for their LN lie and the conspiracy truth may be preserved.
They and their fellow sappers must be exposed and excoriated for what in my informed, Constitutionally-protected opinion they amount to -- accessories after the fact to regicide.
By your leave, kind Sir Jeffrey. Pull out that monogrammed hanky you've inserted up your sleeve and shove it down their filth-spewing throats.
Here are foundational conclusions that provide essential guidance for thinking about the JFK assassination.
We are investigating what I've termed a "solved unsolved crime."
Anyone with reasonable access to the evidence who does not conclude that JFK was killed by criminal conspirators is cognitively impaired and/or complicit complicit in the crime.
Endless regurgitations of long-established proofs of conspiracy serve only to preserve and enhance the cover-up.
The identities of the killers at the Sponsor, Facilitator, and Mechanic levels of the conspiracy (categories described in the Evica-Drago Conspiracy Model) remain, at best, unclear.
Unless the research community can identify its ultimate goal, it will continue to plan a route without a destination.
I submit that our goal must be to define and effect justice for JFK and the untold millions collaterally damaged by his assassins.
I am going to use the above to stick it to the CIA regarding Jahar Tsarnaev and the alleged Boston Marathon bombing. (Previous connections of both brothers to FBI and CIA.)
I recommend everybody else start sticking it to the CIA over Morley's victory, in regard to any case they are working on.
In re "Occam's Razor Redux", I reiterate:
Previously Jefferson Morley had reported that "Nicholas Nalli has posted a thoughtful response to my piece, 'From the New JFK Files: What the Medical Evidence Tells Us,' on Fred Litwin’s blog. Its mild tone is a balm in these disputatious times."
Balderdash!
Mr. Nalli is just a bargain basement Renatus Hartogs for our time. Via a delivery system comprised of disinformation expressed in pseudo-intellectual babble, he attempts to defend the LN lie by application of the Principle of Parsimony.
The essence of Mr. Nalli's argument: a simple lie trumps a complex truth.
A deftly planned and executed intelligence operation that includes a bodyguard of fabricated "evidence" presented via arguments from authority turns William of Occam's celebrated razor into a dullened blade with all the cutting power of a plastic dinner knife.
If Mr. Nalli does not already comprehend this most basic reality, then his analyses of any intel-related phenomena must be considered fatally flawed even as they justly come under suspicion of being wittingly delivered components of the prevarication at hand.
Understand that the foundational goal of the JFK assassination cover-up is not to convince, but to control -- to create, refine, and preserve paralyzing, justice-denying doubt that extends beyond the matter of the Dallas action into the entirety of the culture.
The likes of Mr. Nalli and his mouthpiece, the evil clown Mr. Litwin, are assigned to encourage polite debate so that the illusion of a level playing field for their LN lie and the conspiracy truth may be preserved.
They and their fellow sappers must be exposed and excoriated for what in my informed, Constitutionally-protected opinion they amount to -- accessories after the fact to regicide.
By your leave, kind Sir Jeffrey. Pull out that monogrammed hanky you've inserted up your sleeve and shove it down their filth-spewing throats.
No disputation intended, of course.
Here are foundational conclusions that provide essential guidance for thinking about the JFK assassination.
We are investigating what I've termed a "solved unsolved crime."
Anyone with reasonable access to the evidence who does not conclude that JFK was killed by criminal conspirators is cognitively impaired and/or complicit complicit in the crime.
Endless regurgitations of long-established proofs of conspiracy serve only to preserve and enhance the cover-up.
The identities of the killers at the Sponsor, Facilitator, and Mechanic levels of the conspiracy (categories described in the Evica-Drago Conspiracy Model) remain, at best, unclear.
Unless the research community can identify its ultimate goal, it will continue to plan a route without a destination.
I submit that our goal must be to define and effect justice for JFK and the untold millions collaterally damaged by his assassins.
I have asked Morley several times to respond to this question to no avail:
*Do you think that the Zapruder film was altered as Douglas Horne claims?*
\\][//
Good for J Morley and Rep Luna.
I am going to use the above to stick it to the CIA regarding Jahar Tsarnaev and the alleged Boston Marathon bombing. (Previous connections of both brothers to FBI and CIA.)
I recommend everybody else start sticking it to the CIA over Morley's victory, in regard to any case they are working on.
Sticking It to the CIA, sung to Camptown Races:
1. Let’s all stick it to the CIA, Doo dah, doo dah.
Morley did it for JFK, oh doo dah day.
For twen-ty years he knocked on the door, Doo dah, doo dah.
Representative Luna then gave him the floor, oh doo dah day.
“Lee Harvey” met with CIA. Congress has revealed their works.
So let’s grab a pen and make a list, of what else got done by those jerks.
2. Tonkin Gulf was LBJ’s false flag, Doo dah, doo dah.
He’d started a war to kill our own, back in Nineteen Sixty-three.
Reagan’s CIA sent cocaine to the ghettos, from Ir-an-Con-tra.
But Rep Porter Goss put the kibosh on hearings, so Ollie walked away scot free.
In the ‘90s, Clinton and Reno
did Waco and OKC.
Who cares if McVeigh and Yeakey paid the price, It’s for “National Se-cur-ity.”
3. Meanwhile, Allen Dulles was doing mind control (like MK-Ul-tra).
So the CIA bet we’d be dumb enough to take Nine-Eleven lying down
Yep, it seems we were plenty thick, blam-ing “A-rabs.”
But don’t you worry, we have learned our lesson. Anna Luna wears the crown.
We had “school shootings” here and there (Ask me about Sandy Hook.)
But by God, in the Twenties, Covid smartened us up, and now we’ll bring those bastards to book.
AND NOW WE’LL BRING THOSE BASTARDS TO BOOK.
Please credit Stephen Foster and the 2nd South Carolina String Band (and me) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiix2iu0dfY&list=RDwiix2iu0dfY&start_radio=1